I am slightly uncomfortable about going into my review of Bereavement still a little unsure about how I really feel about it, but there was something going on with this movie that I really enjoyed and thought warranted some attention here. It seems at first to be a tad redundant and formulaic (even though it is much more stylized than similar films), which made me think that I knew exactly where the story was going. However by the end, I was nowhere near where I thought I would be, and that surprise makes me want to give Bereavement at least some props.
In a small town in Pennsylvania, a young boy named Martin is kidnapped by a brutal and psychotic serial killer, Sutter, who is intrigued by Martin's strange demeanor and decides to keep him in order to teach him his killing ways. Five years later, teenager Allison is sent to live in the town with her uncle's family after her parents are killed in a car accident. Allison's curiosity about the abandoned meat plant where Martin and the killer live soon turns about to be a very grave mistake.
Okay, so the reason that I'm not sure that I completely like this film is simply the fact that I don't get the film. I don't get what it's saying or what the point of the whole thing was at all. Mostly, I don't get what was up with Sutter and just what he was trying to "teach" Martin. Basically he is your average psychotic killer spewing out quasi-religious ramblings to a large steer skull hanging on the wall, but why don't we get any kind reasoning behind all this? What the hell is he talking about? I'm at a loss, really.
Well, as it turns out, that just may not be my fault. Not only do the filmmakers make no attempt to give even a fleeting explanation for Sutter's behavior or psychosis, they also fail to mention in their limited advertising that this movie is actually a PREQUEL. It's a prequel to a movie called Malevolence, in which Martin is the main killer, and Bereavement exists as a sort of origin story for Martin. And get this: creator Stevan Mena told everyone when Malevolence came out that the movie was intended to be the middle part of a trilogy. So he makes the second movie first, doesn't make the first movie until six years after the second movie, and as of this date, still has not made the third movie. Does this make any sense? How can we as an audience be expected to follow a story like this? I'm confused.
The gore scenes are not too shabby. There is lots of great use of practical effects and in-your-face blood, especially toward the end when you consider just which characters are becoming the victim of this violence. What you think will happen and who you think will survive is drastically different than what actually occurs - which I of course now know is because this movie is a PREQUEL - but it makes for some pretty shocking revelations the first time through. Anyway. Gore is good. There is one great yet horrific death scene where a girl is hooked through the knee with one of those giant meat hook things, then hoisted up and pulled into a room where she ends up hanging over a very large pillar of fire. I can't think of anything that would suck more than that right now.
Well, as it turns out, that just may not be my fault. Not only do the filmmakers make no attempt to give even a fleeting explanation for Sutter's behavior or psychosis, they also fail to mention in their limited advertising that this movie is actually a PREQUEL. It's a prequel to a movie called Malevolence, in which Martin is the main killer, and Bereavement exists as a sort of origin story for Martin. And get this: creator Stevan Mena told everyone when Malevolence came out that the movie was intended to be the middle part of a trilogy. So he makes the second movie first, doesn't make the first movie until six years after the second movie, and as of this date, still has not made the third movie. Does this make any sense? How can we as an audience be expected to follow a story like this? I'm confused.
Putting all that aside for now, I'm still thinking that Bereavement is a pretty good movie for what it is. The actors are all a bunch of unknowns (except for the one woman playing the aunt who I totally recognized from an episode of Law and Order: SVU because I am obsessed with that show) and they're not horrible. Alexandra Daddario is definitely watchable and a pretty natural actress, not to mention that she has the most amazing eyes I've ever seen. I would say that the little boy playing Martin is also really good, except for the fact that he doesn't have much to do other than stand around and look slightly menacing for 90 minutes.
The gore scenes are not too shabby. There is lots of great use of practical effects and in-your-face blood, especially toward the end when you consider just which characters are becoming the victim of this violence. What you think will happen and who you think will survive is drastically different than what actually occurs - which I of course now know is because this movie is a PREQUEL - but it makes for some pretty shocking revelations the first time through. Anyway. Gore is good. There is one great yet horrific death scene where a girl is hooked through the knee with one of those giant meat hook things, then hoisted up and pulled into a room where she ends up hanging over a very large pillar of fire. I can't think of anything that would suck more than that right now.
So despite the fact that the whole movie is slightly pointless on its own and hard to understand, Bereavement is an okay little horror flick. I might give Malevolence a chance now just to see what kind of killer Martin turns out to be but hopefully this little trilogy will feel more complete when it's actually, you know, complete.
Movie Review: Bereavement (2010). There are any Movie Review: Bereavement (2010) in here.
Popular Posts
Search Here
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(345)
-
▼
July
(37)
- How Did You Come Up With Your Blog Name?
- The Hobbit Trilogy Officially Announced, Possible ...
- The Lord of the Rings in 99 Seconds
- First Look at Younger Gollum
- Jackson, WB In Talks for The Hobbit Trilogy
- The Hobbit Production Video #8 - Final Days of Fil...
- Project Terrible: Hardware (1990)
- Lego Lord of the Rings Video Final Chapter
- Hugo Weaving Comments on The Hobbit Filming Experi...
- The Liebster Award!... Or, An Insanely Long and Se...
- Lego Helm's Deep Diorama
- Lego Lord of the Rings Video Chapter 3
- Project Terrible: Anatomy of a Psycho (1961)
- SDCC 2012: More Cast, Crew Interviews
- SDCC 2012: The Hobbit Panel Video
- SDCC 2012: Jackson On Return to Middle-Earth
- SDCC 2012: The Hobbit Panel with Movie Footage
- SDCC 2012: A Third Hobbit Film?
- SDCC 2012: Cast, Crew Video Interviews
- SDCC 2012: Andy Serkis on Gollum, Directing
- SDCC 2012: Peter Jackson's Post on Con
- SDCC 2012: Elijah Woods Talks The Hobbit
- Movie Review: Bereavement (2010)
- SDCC 2012 Weta Booth, Character Posters, Toy Teases
- Peter Jackson Confirms Hobbit Reel for SDCC 2012
- Lego The Hobbit, LOTR and More at SDCC 2012
- This Is A Happy Michele
- The Hobbit Scroll with 10 Scenes
- First Look at Lego The Hobbit Mini-Figs
- New Hobbit Poster for SDCC
- Project Terrible: The Garbage Pail Kids Movie (1987)
- The Hobbit Wraps Principle Photography
- Weaving on Hobbit in 3D, Returning to Middle-Earth
- The Hobbit Entertainment Weekly Cover, Gallery
- The Hobbit at SDCC 2012
- Lego Lord of the Rings Video Chapter 2
- Guardians of Middle-Earth Gameplay Trailer
-
▼
July
(37)
Featured Post
Hmu Sad Quotes
Hmu Sad Quotes . Performance charts for horizons betapro s p tsx global base metals bull plus etf hmu type etf including. Web i am bent,...